It’s all too easy to find yourself waffling on when talking to a reporter, instead of getting to the heart of the matter. Most journalists are under lots of time pressure, and if they’re not sure what you’re trying to say, they will quickly make their excuses and move on to someone else. Academics tend to examine the evidence, test it against a hypothesis, then reach a conclusion – this may sound pretty logical but it’s not the approach to follow. Journalists tend to put their stories together precisely the opposite way around – headline first, with an opening paragraph summarising the key findings – followed by evidence and detail only so far as space allows. Too often the reporter calls up an ‘expert’ to find out what something means, particularly on technical topics, then has to listen for what seems like several minutes before they get to the nub of the issue – by that time the journalist may have lost interest. (adapted from the book The M-Factor by Tom Maddocks)
We can now offer on-camera and autocue skills coaching for spokespeople who have to present online video material or webinars.
Call Us on 0208 746 1634
- If you want to be noticed, time to beef up your 'thought leadership' content! But how? New blog post:… https://t.co/L6R7L0OAXr 05:29:33 PM November 26, 2021
- Friday #mediatraining tip: In a radio or television interview, keep your answers reasonably tight, but don’t make t… https://t.co/NsFQz63mJj 08:33:00 AM November 26, 2021
- Blog revisited: Hargreaves Lansdown, the Woodford affair and and the value of corporate reputation https://t.co/iAqqutdf97 07:23:00 AM November 25, 2021